« I was torn between three real-estate platforms. The scoring tipped me toward ClubFunding — low default rate, mortgage-backed guarantees, real traceability. No regrets after 14 months. »
Julien M.
Manager, Lyon
40 platforms analyzed, 12 ECSP-licensed, one transparent scoring.
Aggregated data across all tracked platforms. Updated monthly.
Tracked platforms
40
Cumulative volume
28.6 Mds €
Investors
2.2M
Median yield
11.7%
Average default
1.3%
Ranking
| # | Platform | Type | Yield | Default | Volume | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | BienPrêter | Business lending | 12.0% | 0% | 130 M€ | 88 | |
| 02 | Mintos | P2P marketplace | 10.8% | 10% | 12.5 Mds € | 87 | |
| 03 | Swaper | P2P marketplace | 13.8% | 0% | 1.1 Mds € | 82 | |
| 04 | Bondora | Consumer lending | 6.0% | 0% | 2.0 Mds € | 78 | |
| 05 | PeerBerry | P2P marketplace | 9.0% | 0% | 3.3 Mds € | 77 | |
| 06 | Finbee | Consumer lending | 13.0% | 3.2% | 130 M€ | 76 | |
| 07 | Lendopolis | Renewable energy / Forestry | 6.5% | 5.4% | 419 M€ | 74 | |
| 08 | Enerfip | Renewable energy / Forestry | 6.6% | 1.7% | 844 M€ | 73 | |
| 09 | Iuvo Group | P2P marketplace | 9.2% | 2.8% | 1.0 Mds € | 72 | |
| 10 | Fagura | Consumer lending | 12.0% | 4.5% | 20 M€ | 69 |
Our angle
Too many investors compare platforms on the headline rate alone. Our scoring covers 8 dimensions: financial strength, transparency, real guarantees, monitoring quality, regulatory status, age, liquidity and default history.
Red flags
No ECSP/AMF status disclosed
Outside the European framework since Nov. 2023.
Opaque or recent default rate
No figure, or under 18 months of history.
"Marketing" guarantees
Vague, unquantified personal sureties.
Net yield > 12% with no counterpart
Promises incompatible with the real risk.
Testimonials
Retail investors share how our scoring helped them decide.
« I was torn between three real-estate platforms. The scoring tipped me toward ClubFunding — low default rate, mortgage-backed guarantees, real traceability. No regrets after 14 months. »
Julien M.
Manager, Lyon
« Finally a comparison without hidden affiliate links. I diversified on Enerfip for renewables and BienPrêter for SMEs, exactly as suggested by the detailed profiles. »
Sophie L.
Doctor, Nantes
« The score breakdown (regulation, default, liquidity) saved me from two platforms I was about to try. Mintos remains my main pick thanks to the secondary market. »
Karim B.
Freelancer, Paris
« Very clear, very factual. No yield promises, just the numbers. I started on October with €500 and ramped up gradually. »
Élodie R.
Architect, Bordeaux
« I'd been following Latvian crowdlending for a while without knowing how to sort through it. The Swaper and Debitum profiles gave me the right comparison criteria. »
Antoine D.
Engineer, Toulouse
« A rare editorial approach in this sector. The methodology is spelled out, I can redo the math myself. That's what convinced me to trust them. »
Marie T.
Consultant, Lille
Every week, we round up the key moves, platform news, regulatory updates, and market signals from the European crowdlending space — so you never miss what matters.
Join the weekly digest
Free. One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.
A filterable table, detailed profiles, and the same methodology applied across the board.
Crowdlending, also called peer-to-peer or P2P lending, lets individual investors fund loans to consumers, businesses, real estate developers or energy projects through an online platform, in exchange for interest. Capital is at risk: borrowers can default and platforms can fail.
Crowdscope is an independent observatory of European crowdlending platforms. Every platform is scored out of 100 from eight public criteria — track record, funded volume, registered investors, secondary market, guarantees, regulation, transparency and cash drag — and documented with a detailed profile covering yields, default rates and regulatory status.
Crowdscope currently tracks 40 platforms. The highest Crowdscope score is held by BienPrêter (88/100), and the full ranking with filters by country, loan type, yield and ECSP status is published on the platforms page.
Since 2021, EU platforms funding business and real estate loans must hold the European Crowdfunding Service Provider (ECSP) licence, supervised by their national regulator. Consumer-loan marketplaces, notably in the Baltics, fall outside ECSP and operate under national investment-brokerage or unregulated regimes — a difference Crowdscope reflects in the regulation score.
You can lose your entire invested capital. The main risks are borrower default, loan originator insolvency, platform failure, and illiquidity when no secondary market exists. Crowdscope publishes a default rate, a guarantees list and a secondary-market flag per platform so these risks can be compared before investing.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team